My thoughts about the second reading were something
that I can relate to. I’m currently in school and I have other family members
who are in high school and middle school. Since education is key and cost, I felt
people in poverty would struggle with education. In a section in the book on
page 117, discusses the situation of cut backs and when I was in high school that’s
when I first heard about cut backs. I felt like they were taking away programs
that helped financially and programs that allows students to express
themselves. “In a desperate attempt to save money, states also began cutting
back the number of weeks in the school years, one unintended consequences of
which was that hungry children, whose main meals came through free school
breakfast and lunch programs, spent more each year hungry” (117). It’s
interesting that the state would have to make their school systems cut back on
programs that help students eat or cutting back on how much education a student
should get.
A question that I would like to pose is, what was the argument
against feeding student everyday throughout the school year? The answer is “If you feed them
three square meals a day during the school year, how can you expect them to feed
themselves during the summer” (118).
No comments:
Post a Comment